Introduction
DM assesses a student’s ability to analyseinformation, recognise patterns, evaluate arguments and draw logical conclusions. Introduced in officially in 2016, DM is now a staple part of the UCAT.
DM assesses a student’s ability to analyseinformation, recognise patterns, evaluate arguments and draw logical conclusions. Introduced in officially in 2016, DM is now a staple part of the UCAT.

There are 35 questions to be completed in 37 minutes working out to roughly a minute per question. Marking works slightly differently compared to the other two 300 – 900 scored sections, with single answer questions worth 1 mark but multiple statement questions being worth 2 marks. 1 mark is awarded to partially correct responses on the multiple-statement questions.
There are several different types of DM questions, occurring with a standardised frequency /35 total questions.

There are 5 main types of DM questions. These are syllogisms, logical puzzles, argument evaluation, data interpretation, probability, appearing in that chronological order in the exam.
Syllogisms involve a “stem” passage of text, followed by 5 statements, to which the candidate must ascribe “yes” or “no” to. The passage of text may be divided/categorised as basic, narrative, or data-based. The statements may have direct explicit evidence from the passage that support it, or require inference. “Yes” requires the entirety of the statement to logically follow, and “No” only requires a part of the statement to be disproved by information in the passage, or for there to be insufficient information in the text to evidence the statement. The statements are independent of each other, and should be considered as such, rather than as a collective. 2 marks are awarded if the candidate selects the correct answer to all 5 statements, and 1 mark is awarded to 4/5 statements being correct.
Logical puzzles consist of a stem that may be just text, or text accompanied by a diagram. The question is followed by 4 answer options. This type of question generally lends itself to be represented by a suitable schematic/diagram to help answer, and considering the order of information is incredibly important to determine the correct answer.
Argument evaluation presents a question followed by 4 arguments (typically 2 for and 2 against). The student must select the strongest argument out of the 4 available options, which refers to the argument that addresses all parts/topics of the question.
Data interpretation has a similar layout to syllogisms, with a “stem” passage of text and a graph/table/diagram, followed by 5 statements, to which the candidate must ascribe “yes” or “no” to. These questions often also involve some degree of mathematical calculations, though this is not excessive or complex.
Probability refers to question types involving probabilities. There is generally some degree of calculation involved but again not substantial. There is again a stem passage followed by 4 answer options.

There are different strategies required to approach each question type.
Some tips that can be applied across different question types include reading the answer options first, to avoid doing more work than necessary to answer the question, and also helping to zone in on the areas in the stem required to answer the question. Again, a process of elimination is also important here, and reading the answer options first helps with this. For logical puzzles, syllogisms, probability, drawing diagrams might be helpful or essential for the question.

As with every section, timed practice is the most important revision strategy to effectively improve your DM score. As mentioned, each distinct question type requires a different approach and employs different skills, so using question banks to hone on a particular subtype for practice, and tracking question type performance is incredibly important.

Students commonly make assumptions often using external knowledge or logic, rather than focusing on what the text directly states and implies. Sometimes, candidates can overcomplicate questions in this section, rather than simply thinking logically. Again, the different question types require different lengths of time to complete, so students need to have practiced full section mocks to have an awareness of time management relative to the question types they have already completed.

For UCAT Decision Making support, Dr Admissions uses the EdUCATe™ method to help students build the precision, speed and logic needed for one of the most technique-driven UCAT sections. Students learn to Evaluate their weaknesses across syllogisms, logical puzzles, probability, Venn diagrams, interpreting information and argument evaluation; Design a targeted plan to improve the highest-impact question types; Understand the reasoning methods behind each format; Consolidate accuracy through focused drills; Apply strategies under timed UCAT conditions; and Transform performance using feedback, score tracking and refined exam technique. This gives students a clear, systematic approach to improving both accuracy and timing in Decision Making.
Yes, the different questions types will also appear in the same order, helping a student to allot and manage their time effectively. The number of questions of each type is roughly also always the same, with small amounts of variation
Many students struggle with Decision Making because it combines logic, maths, critical thinking and time pressure. The section rewards methodical reasoning rather than guesswork, so students need clear strategies for each question style.
The fastest way to improve is to focus on accuracy first, then timing. Students should learn the core techniques from an experience tutor for each question type, practise targeted drills, review every mistake carefully and complete timed sets to build exam speed.
Decision Making is mainly a logic and reasoning section, but some questions involve basic probability, ratios, percentages or interpreting numerical data. Strong performance comes from combining logical structure with quick, accurate calculation.